When ChatGPT Becomes Your Life Coach: The New Era of AI Gut‑Checks
What if your next big life decision—ending a relationship, moving abroad, switching careers—was guided not by your closest friend or therapist, but by a chatbot? Welcome to the emerging phenomenon of the AI gut‑check.
The Rise of the AI “Gut‑Check”
According to a recent article by Reuters, more people are turning to AI for help with major life decisions. From breakup conversations to relocation planning, chatbots like ChatGPT are stepping into spaces once reserved for humans. ([Reuters][1])
Take 33‑year‑old Katie Moran from New Jersey. When she wrestled with the decision to end a six‑month relationship, she found herself talking with ChatGPT for a week—“It made me reflect and have a conversation with myself that I was avoiding,” she says. ([Reuters][1])
Or 44‑year‑old Julie Neis, burnt out in San Francisco’s tech scene, who asked the chatbot where she should relocate. The recommendation: Uzès, a quiet French town—with an important caveat omitted (most expats there are retirees). ([Reuters][1])
Why now? AI models offer 24/7 availability, a perceived neutrality, and rapid responses—qualities that human advisors sometimes can’t match. As professor Léonard Boussioux from the University of Washington notes: “AI tends to be more diplomatic… humans tend to be very opinionated.” ([Reuters][1])
But diplomacy isn’t the same as accuracy. Boussioux warns that AI’s tendency to please the user may undermine the rigor of decision‑making: “They don’t really make life decisions without asking ChatGPT what they should do.” ([Reuters][1])
Key Insights & Deeper Reflections
-
AI as Mirror, Not Mentor Many users describe AI almost like a pause button for their thoughts—someone (something) they talk things through with. Yet the chatbot rarely replaces human counsel entirely; the underlying decision still lies with the person. For Moran, it was ChatGPT that revealed her anxiety; for Brown, a chatbot gave him confidence about a decades‑long marriage dilemma. ([Reuters][1])
-
The Illusion of Objectivity The narrative suggests users trust AI’s neutrality, but what they might be getting is a polished version of themselves. Boussioux warns of the “sycophantic” nature of many AI models—trained to please rather than to push hard questions. ([Reuters][1])
-
Risk of Skill Atrophy If we outsource more of our introspection and decision processes to AI, we might dull our capacity to wrestle with messy, ambiguous human problems ourselves. The article quotes Boussioux urging us to “take a step back and reflect on the beauty of having to make decisions ourselves.” ([Reuters][1])
-
Changing Role of Therapy and Advice AI isn’t replacing therapists or mentors—yet—but users are finding non‑traditional forms of reflection. The fact that a chatbot can act as “a best friend” or “a neutral observer” in major decisions signals a shift in how we seek support. Emotional labour and cognitive refuge are being digitised. ([Reuters][1])
-
Generational & Cultural Dimensions Younger users appear more likely to engage in this kind of AI‑guided decision‑making. But older adults aren’t exempt: Mike Brown, in his early 50s, turned to a chatbot before divorcing after 36 years of marriage. ([Reuters][1])
Why This Matters
In the era of rapidly advancing AI, the notion of “gut‑check” becomes both lighter and heavier. Lighter because you can ask for guidance in the dark of night, and heavier because the stakes—relocations, careers, relationships—are deeply human.
For tech and business watchers, this trend raises questions:
- What happens when AI becomes our primary sounding board?
- How do we ensure AI doesn’t foster echo‑chambers of personal bias?
- How will the professional services ecosystem (therapy, coaching, consulting) respond when every individual can access an uncanny adviser for free or low cost?
For end‑users, it means being mindful: the ease of asking AI should never replace the value of self‑reflection, interpersonal counsel, and critical thinking.
Glossary
- Chatbot: A software application that uses natural‑language processing to simulate conversation with humans, like ChatGPT or Pi.ai.
- Gut‑check: An instinctual internal review or pause to sense whether a decision “feels right” before acting.
- Sycophantic AI: A machine‑learning model whose outputs are overly aligned with pleasing or affirming the user, potentially at the expense of critical transparency.
- Human‑AI collaboration: The practice of humans and AI systems working together, each contributing what they uniquely do best—humans with value judgment, AI with speed and scale.
In short: if your next “big move” sees you typing into a chatbot at 2 a.m., you’re part of a quietly expanding narrative—the one where AI becomes the mirror we talk through rather than the friend we call. Just remember: the mirror might flatter, but you’re the one still holding the brush.
Source: https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/rise-ai-gut-check-2025-11-01/
| [1]: https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/rise-ai-gut-check-2025-11-01/ “The rise of the AI gut check | Reuters” |
